Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Christine M.

How Many Mp Do I Need?

5 posts in this topic

I am thinking (again) of investing in a point-and-shoot. The camera I have now, a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 is just more than I need. I bought it a 3 or 4 years ago because it had all the settings of a manual or dslr camera (shutter speed, aperature, etc.), and I wanted to learn to take really great pictures, take a photography class etc.. But I have just never found the time. And it is kind of big and heavy, and I am reluctant to take it to places like the beach or the park for fear it will get damaged (considering how expensive it was).

 

My Panasonic is a 10.1 MP with 12x optical zoom. When I import the pictures into PSE, they are usually some ridiculous size, like 50x30 at 72 dpi. Even when I resize to 300 dpi, the pics are still 9x12 or something like that.

 

So finally, the question. How many MP in a p&s do I need to get scrap quality pictures. I would like occasionally to use larger pics (8x10 or a full 12x12), but most of the time I use 4x6. I don't exactly understand the correlation between MPs and dpi, other than "bigger is better." But how big is big enough without being too big?

 

Then, of course, what camera should I pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say you could probably get by with 7 megapixels for scrapping and for the occasional 8x10. The problem is finding current cameras with that low of a capability.

 

I have a Kodak similar to your Panasonic Lumix with more controls, similar zoom and 10 mp. I love it but I decided to buy a P&S to be able to carry in my pocket when I'm out walking or in my sporran when I'm in my pipeband uniform. I did get a 10 MP, mostly because I wanted more than 3x zoom and the 5x zoom or greater all were 10 mp or greater. I have since purchased a DSLR that is 12 MP. I use all three cameras.

 

Just my two cents worth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know that you'll find one with less mp than what Pat mentioned. I have a little one that I carry in my purse that is 6 mp and I can scrap with the photos just fine. It is pretty old. I use my DSLR for most things though. We gave a little camera to my son for Christmas last year and it is 12 mp. It wasn't very expensive either. I find that sometimes, when I can't get as close as I'd like to something, it is really nice to be able to crop and still have a decent size left to work with. If the larger files are a bother for you, you can set the quality lower on any digital camera. I don't recommend it though. Enjoy shopping for your new camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 is good. the large files are something separated from the number of MP and can be changed in any camera. I like having a tiny camera on hand to carry in pocket or purse, however the size of the camera doesn't necessarily make it any less of a good instrument. I hope at some point you can have the time to learn more about your camera, its a really good one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't recall which professional I was reading said this, but he said actually 6 MP was fine for your normal picture taking. Meaning basically printing out mostly 4 x6 pics. So i guess it depends on what your style of scrapping is. Do you zoom in alot and need more MP would probably be a consideration. But I think most point and shoots are at least 8 or more anyway now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites